Ferrari disappoints itself as soon as once more. In fashionable Method 1, tire administration is a crucial issue for efficiency. Failing to optimize tire utilization considerably limits a group’s competitiveness, and in the course of the first qualifying session of the Qatar weekend, Ferrari uncovered its vulnerabilities on this space. The problem, exacerbated by unexpectedly cool temperatures in comparison with these in Saudi Arabia, left the Maranello group unable to adapt successfully. The Q3 session served as a transparent instance, with the Ferrari drivers showing unsure about proceed, compounded by inadequate help from the pit wall.
Within the sole observe session obtainable, Ferrari targeted closely on balancing the automobile. They carried out in depth laps utilizing the Arduous compound to realize constant efficiency. For Qatar, the group opted for a medium-high downforce rear wing, a choice aligned with most different groups. Whereas not reaching the utmost potential stage, the setup was barely under optimum. Vital efforts have been additionally made to validate the up to date ground, that includes modifications across the edge. This improve was briefly examined by Carlos Sainz in Las Vegas in the course of the first observe session, whereas in Losail, it was Charles Leclerc’s flip to trial it.
Inspired by optimistic suggestions from automobile quantity 16, Ferrari determined to retain the up to date ground for qualifying and the Dash Race, with the choice to revert to the older specification if wanted. Throughout the restricted 60-minute session to fine-tune the vehicles, Charles Leclerc was instructed to carry out a number of managed laps on the Medium tires to check the ground. These runs, carried out with out the usage of aero rakes or flow-viz, relied solely on load cells. In the meantime, the Tender compound remained largely untested, leaving questions on its efficiency for the Dash Qualifying session.
Throughout qualifying, each drivers complained about important rotation points, which proved to be the first impediment to unlocking efficiency. The vehicles suffered from understeer that transitioned into oversteer throughout nook exits. Whereas the vehicles did generate substantial downforce, a optimistic takeaway for the Maranello group, the lack to take care of the goal tire temperatures robbed them of crucial grip. This was an sudden setback for Ferrari, which had designed a warm-up technique that originally appeared efficient.
Including to the poor outcome was a setup that didn’t carry out optimally below the cooler circumstances. Ferrari was caught off guard, neglecting to make setup changes to counteract the dearth of rotation. As an alternative, they relied on information gathered throughout FP1, satisfied that the correct tire administration technique would yield the specified efficiency. Sadly, this strategy proved ineffective, and as soon as once more, the 2 SF-24 vehicles displayed important untapped potential. Efficiency that would have made a distinction was left unrealized resulting from poor execution.
McLaren demonstrated precisely what Ferrari was lacking: wonderful steadiness, achieved via optimum tire administration. The MCL38 featured a pointy and exact front-end that labored harmoniously with the rear, sustaining secure alignment between the 2 axes. The McLaren vehicles dominated the primary two sectors of the monitor, whereas Verstappen claimed the quickest time within the third. McLaren’s tires activated extra rapidly—a attribute trait of the papaya automobile—whereas Ferrari opted for a delayed activation technique, aiming to learn from better grip throughout the remainder of the lap.
With the Tender compounds, nonetheless, Ferrari tried to regulate preliminary tire temperatures to enhance efficiency within the first sector. This strategy backfired, resulting in front-end overheating and exacerbating the rotation points beforehand famous. McLaren additionally confronted challenges stabilizing tire temperatures however in the end succeeded, whereas for Ferrari, this job changed into a nightmare, derailing their whole technique in the course of the crucial moments of the session. With restricted time and already-used tires, there was no alternative for Ferrari to get better.
Mercedes as soon as once more delivered a formidable efficiency, significantly via George Russell, aided by the cooler monitor temperature of simply 21.5°C. These circumstances helped the W15 mitigate overheating points successfully. Quicker tire activation in the course of the out-lap supplied better grip over a single lap, permitting Russell’s automobile to outperform the SF-24 when it comes to outright efficiency. Moreover, Russell’s exact dealing with performed an important function in extracting the automobile’s potential.
Lastly, Purple Bull. Max Verstappen admitted he wasn’t quick sufficient in the course of the session. The RB20’s major situation was its steadiness. Throughout the sole observe session, the group struggled to seek out an optimum working window for the automobile. Verstappen didn’t pinpoint a single drawback however famous understeer in some corners and over-rotation in others, with the entrance and rear axes disconnected—a recurring situation in latest weeks. General, the compromise Purple Bull settled on proved much less efficient than the setups chosen by Ferrari and McLaren.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
